Ken Ip says the first five-year plan gives the city a destination, but the real story will be whether all these seemingly separate roads eventually lead to the same place

Hong Kong has always been rather good at living in the present. The stock market opens at 9:30 am. Property prices are discussed by lunchtime. The latest economic figures are analyzed by dinner. Even government policy has traditionally arrived in annual instalments, with each Policy Address providing another set of initiatives for the city to digest. Today, that rhythm changed.

The special administrative region’s first five-year plan, unveiled on Wednesday alongside the 2026 Policy Address, effectively gave the city something it has never formally had before: a longer-term operating manual.

The interesting question is not simply what the SAR government wants to do over the next five years. It is what kind of Hong Kong it wants to build. Read through the plan, and a striking picture emerges. This is no longer simply a story about preserving Hong Kong’s traditional strengths. It is an attempt to add new economic engines to an old but remarkably resilient machine.

Finance remains firmly in the driver’s seat. Hong Kong wants to strengthen its position as an international financial center, offshore renminbi hub, asset and wealth management center and risk management center. It is also looking beyond stocks and bonds, with ambitions for gold and commodities trading, digital finance, tokenization and new forms of financial infrastructure. The message is quite clear. Hong Kong does not intend to reinvent itself by abandoning what it already does well but financialize the future.

ALSO READ: Hong Kong’s five-year plan ushers in a new era

That may sound like a contradiction, but it could become one of the city’s more interesting advantages. Artificial intelligence companies need capital. New industries need risk management. Infrastructure needs financing. Digital assets need regulated markets. Even the emerging economy around green fuels, advanced technology and commodities will require insurance, settlement, trading and investment. Hong Kong’s proposition is increasingly becoming: Whatever the next industry is, it will still need a financial center.

Then there is the Northern Metropolis. For years, the project was discussed primarily in terms of land, housing and infrastructure. The blueprint gives it a much bigger job, positioning it as a platform where universities, research institutions, technology companies, industrial clusters and communities coexist. That is an important shift.

A city does not become an innovation hub simply because it builds laboratories. Nor does a university become entrepreneurial because it puts the word “innovation” on a building. The real test is whether ideas move. From professor to startup. From laboratory to factory. From startup to investor. From university graduate to entrepreneur. From Hong Kong to Shenzhen, and back again. Therefore the plan’s emphasis on “industry, academia and research” integration is more consequential than another technology slogan. Hong Kong has world-class universities, international capital and proximity to one of the world’s largest manufacturing and tech ecosystems. The missing ingredient has often been the plumbing connecting them. The Northern Metropolis is, at least in theory, an attempt to build that plumbing.

Education is another piece of the puzzle. The government plans to increase publicly funded postgraduate research places by around 30 percent by 2030-31, while AI is expected to become increasingly embedded in learning, teaching and assessment. The ambition is not simply to produce more graduates but to build a deeper talent and research base around the economy Hong Kong hopes to create. This is where the five-year horizon makes sense.

Talent policy is almost impossible to judge in a single budget cycle. A research student today could become a founder, scientist or industry leader a decade from now. A university campus announced today may take years before it changes the surrounding economy.

The same applies to infrastructure. Hong Kong plans to replace or repair 350 kilometers of aging water pipes over five years. It wants underground utility corridors in new development areas. It is exploring an AI-powered “city brain” to connect data across government departments. None of these ideas will make international headlines. But cities are ultimately judged by things that rarely make headlines: whether the water works, whether traffic moves, whether hospitals cope, whether housing is available and whether public services improve without requiring residents to understand which government department is responsible.

There is also a more unusual part of the five-year strategy: population. The government is promoting fertility measures, including higher incentives for second and subsequent children. Housing policies are being adjusted, while the education and healthcare systems are being expanded. This reveals something important about Hong Kong’s challenge.

The city is not merely trying to grow its economy. It is trying to shape the conditions under which people will choose to live, work, study, raise families and invest their futures here. That is a much bigger project. And it explains why today’s announcement should not be read as just another Policy Address. The five-year plan turns individual policies into a portfolio of investments.

READ MORE: HKSAR plans coherent path to progress

Some are defensive, designed to reinforce existing strengths such as finance, trade and professional services. Some are expansionary, such as the Northern Metropolis and university development. Others are visionary, including AI, tokenization, commodities and emerging technology.

Not every investment will pay off. That is normal. In business, investors do not expect every investment to become a unicorn. They expect the portfolio to produce enough winners to justify the risk.

The introduction of clearer targets and key performance indicators is a more significant aspect of Wednesday’s announcement. A five-year plan without measurable milestones is simply a long document. With milestones, it becomes something residents, businesses and the government itself can revisit. Five years from now, Hong Kong should not have to ask whether the plan was ambitious but questions about outcomes. Did the Northern Metropolis create the ecosystem it promised? Did universities become more connected to industry? Did AI actually raise productivity? Did Hong Kong capture new financial opportunities? Did better infrastructure improve everyday life? Did the city attract and retain the talent it wanted? And perhaps the biggest question of all: Did these initiatives reinforce one another, or simply become another collection of government programs?

Hong Kong has spent decades learning how to move quickly. Its next challenge may be learning how to move deliberately. The first five-year plan gives the city a destination. The real story will be whether all these seemingly separate roads eventually lead to the same place. And, perhaps for the first time, Hong Kong has given itself five years to find out.

The author is chairman of the Asia MarTech Society and sits on the advisory boards of several professional organizations, including two universities.

The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.