In a recent announcement, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government announced yet another postponement in the implementation of the long-awaited waste-charging program. Originally scheduled to commence in April, the program has faced multiple setbacks, with the latest postponement pushing it back to August. While the objective behind the waste-charging program is commendable, it is crucial to consider its potential impact on the public and explore alternative measures to achieve sustainable waste management.

The waste-charging program aims to encourage residents to reduce waste and increase recycling by requiring them to purchase government-approved garbage bags for disposal. Under the program, designated plastic bags in various sizes would be available for a nominal fee, with each liter of capacity costing HK$0.11 (1.4 US cents). However, concerns have been raised regarding the financial burden it may impose on low-income households and the elderly.

One of the primary concerns voiced by critics is the potential financial strain on low-income families. Allocating a portion of their limited incomes to purchase garbage bags could exacerbate their financial challenges. Even with government subsidies in place, low-income households would still need to spend a considerable amount on these bags every month, leading to an increased burden on those already struggling to make ends meet.

Furthermore, the effective implementation of the waste-charging program requires significant manpower to ensure compliance. Without strict adherence to the rules, the task of waste management becomes more arduous for cleaning workers, jeopardizing the program’s overall effectiveness. It is crucial to strike a balance between environmental responsibility and the practicality of implementation, ensuring that the burden does not fall disproportionately on certain segments of society.

While the waste-charging program has been touted as a successful approach in other advanced societies, the unique circumstances of Hong Kong must be taken into account. The city faces its own set of challenges, including densely populated areas, limited space, and diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. Therefore, it is essential to explore alternative measures that address these specific circumstances while promoting sustainable waste management.

One such alternative is a holistic approach to waste reduction and recycling. The government should focus on raising awareness and educating the public about reducing waste at its source. By encouraging responsible consumption patterns and promoting recycling habits, Hong Kong can achieve sustainable waste management without burdening its residents financially.

Additionally, the establishment of more recycling facilities, especially in older districts and rural areas, would facilitate the recycling process. By making recycling more accessible and convenient, the government can encourage greater participation from the public. It is equally important to extend support to institutions such as care homes, which face unique challenges in waste reduction, by providing them with the necessary resources and guidance.

The government must seize this opportunity to engage with the public, address concerns, and work toward a waste management strategy that is equitable, effective and environmentally responsible

To ensure the effectiveness of any waste management strategy, regular evaluations and assessments are paramount. The government should establish a comprehensive review system that monitors the program’s progress in terms of waste reduction, recycling rates, and the sale of authorized bags. This approach allows for necessary adjustments and improvements based on real-time data, ensuring the program’s continued relevance and effectiveness.

While the latest delay in the waste-charging program may disappoint some, it presents an opportunity for the government to rethink its approach. By taking into account public concerns and exploring alternative measures, Hong Kong can strike a balance between environmental responsibility and the socioeconomic well-being of its residents. Collaboration between the government, environmental organizations and the public is crucial in developing a sustainable waste management strategy that works for everyone.

Moreover, the government should actively engage with the public and address its concerns regarding the waste-charging program. Transparent communication and public consultations can help build trust and ensure that the program’s implementation aligns with the needs and aspirations of the community. By fostering a sense of ownership and collective responsibility, the government can encourage active participation and cooperation of residents.

Despite the good intentions, the proposed waste-charging program faces yet another delay, prompting a critical examination of its potential impact on the public. While the objective of promoting sustainable waste management is commendable, it is essential to consider the financial burden on low-income families and explore alternative measures that address the city’s unique challenges. By adopting a holistic approach, including raising awareness, improving recycling infrastructure, and regular evaluations, Hong Kong can pave the way for a cleaner and more sustainable future without unduly burdening its residents. The government must seize this opportunity to engage with the public, address concerns, and work toward a waste management strategy that is equitable, effective and environmentally responsible.

The author is chairman of the Asia MarTech Society and also holds the position of assistant professor at Saint Francis University in Tseung Kwan O.

The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.