January 6, 2021, is yet another memorable day in the history of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region because 53 individuals, including Benny Tai Yiu-ting, involved in planning, organizing and carrying out such illegal acts last year as â35-plusâ, âTen steps to mutual destructionâ and âparalyze the SAR governmentâ, were arrested en masse by Hong Kong police according to the National Security Law and other relevant Hong Kong laws. It is no doubt a decisive step taken by the Hong Kong law enforcement authorities to protect social stability and Hong Kong peopleâs well-being as well as ensuring that the implementation of âone country, two systemsâ proceeds on the right track.
The 53 persons are leading figures of radical groups known collectively as the âburn together factionâ and all played prominent roles in the illegal âprimary electionâ last July. The so-called âprimaryâ was conceptualized in March last year, planned in April, crowdfunded and publicized in June and held in early July. In a nutshell, it was a carefully planned, organized and executed subversive act in violation of the National Security Law promulgated on June 30, 2020. There is undeniable evidence supporting subversion charges against them.
Benny Taiâs âTen steps to mutual destructionâ plan is a bona fide road map for the âburn together factionâ to achieve their subversive objectives and therefore a piece of undeniable evidence
For starters, Hong Kong law does not mention âprimary electionâ in any shape or form, meaning the one held last July by the opposition camp was absolutely devoid of legal basis and might have involved money laundering, illegitimate candidacy and Election Ordinance violations. Moreover, it was openly billed by its organizers as aiming for winning â35+â majority seats in the now-postponed 2020 Legislative Council (LegCo) Election with the sole purpose of blocking government budgets and bills and paralyzing the HKSAR government. Apparently it ticks all the boxes in crime of âconspiracy to subvert state powerâ listed in Article 22 of the National Security Law in effect in Hong Kong.
Let no one forget that the Standing Committee of the National Peopleâs Congress started drafting the National Security Law for implementation in the HKSAR in May last year and announced its promulgation on June 30, effective immediately. Although the opposition âprimaryâ was conceived and planned before the promulgation of the National Security Law, which is not retro-applicable, it was held after the National Security Law took effect. That means the organizers knew very well the âprimaryâ, which is the first step of their âTen steps to mutual destructionâ scheme, would violate the National Security Law and relevant Hong Kong laws but went ahead anyway. The âprimaryâ violated not only the National Security Law but also the âone country, two systemsâ principle. By doing it, the opposition camp and the âburn together factionâ in particular practically turned themselves in as criminal suspects.
As a matter of fact, the âburn together factionâ had plenty of time to call off the âprimaryâ but didnât, despite repeated warnings by the SAR government that such an act could seriously violate the Election Ordinance as well as the National Security Law. As it was meant to happen, the âburn together factionâ was so sure of support by external forces it completely ignored the rule of law at its own peril.
After the police made the arrests on Wednesday the âburn together factionâ and its overseas supporters lost no time accusing the authorities of âpolitical prosecutionâ and âsummary score settlingâ, insisting the Basic Law gives them the right to veto the governmentâs Budget Plan when appropriate. That argument, however, is nothing but an attempt to move the goal, since the 2020-21 Budget Plan was yet to be presented when the âburn together factionâ vowed to block it. Besides, they would also veto all government funding bills once they became the LegCo majority in order to paralyze the SAR government, a necessary step toward subverting state power. Widely known as the chief architect of multiple instances of electoral manipulations so far, Benny Tai, the key plotter of the scheme, published a detailed plan in Apple Daily last April under the headline âTen steps toward mutual destruction: Hong Kongâs destinyâ. That article qualifies as an official declaration of the âburn together factionâ on its grand scheme of subversion, including the âprimaryâ and LegCo majority it aimed to seize. Clearly the âprimaryâ was a follow-up to the âblack revolutionâ criminal campaign of 2019 according to the âTen steps to mutual destructionâ plan.
âBlack revolutionâ was no doubt a copy of previous âcolor revolutionsâ that wreaked havoc in some Middle Eastern, northern African and Eastern European countries in the post-Cold War era. Its goal was to facilitate local radicalsâ attempt to seize the overall jurisdiction over the HKSAR from the central government in Beijing, and establish an independent political entity called âNew Hong Kongâ. The political machinations by the radicals including the âblack revolutionâ and the âTen steps to mutual destructionâ plot aimed at paralyzing the HKSAR government have received generous support from their foreign patrons, who sought political upheaval and social unrest in Hong Kong to facilitate their geopolitical agenda against Beijing.
Benny Taiâs âTen steps to mutual destructionâ plan is a bona fide road map for the âburn together factionâ to achieve their subversive objectives and therefore a piece of undeniable evidence to their violation of the National Security Law and other relevant Hong Kong laws. No matter what they are trying to do to avoid criminal liability, be it making excuses, shifting blame, sowing discord in Hong Kong society or stirring public fear, it will fail for sure. Any smokescreen launched by Tai and his cohorts wonât hide their true criminal intent to harm national security while sacrificing Hong Kong society.
The National Security Law has paved the way for Hong Kong to end social unrest and restore law and order, beginning with bringing those who committed subversion to justice. Itâs time to make them pay for challenging the rule of law in Hong Kong. The actions taken by law-enforcement authorities against the subversives are completely necessary to maintain the constitutional order in Hong Kong and ensure the faithful implementation of âone country, two systemsâ.
The author is a current affairs commentator.
The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.
