Bloc must adopt a fresh mindset and deepen engagement with China amid shared challenges
In 30 years of firsthand experience, including living and working in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, I have witnessed the remarkable scale and speed of China’s transformation.
Living in China opens your eyes to how disconnected the European Union’s rhetoric has become and why it is time for Europe to adapt. As the world confronts the storms of protectionism and unilateralism, the EU should step up its approach toward China and work more closely with dynamic Asian economies to promote multilateralism, global stability and shared prosperity.
In its “EU-China: A Strategic Outlook” report published in 2019, the EU labeled China as a “partner, competitor and systemic rival”. While this language was intended to capture the complexity of the relationship, it reflected Europe’s unease. Its continued use is a diplomatic obstacle, out of step with today’s global realities and a constant source of unnecessary tension in EU-China dialogues.
READ MORE: Xi urges China and EU to strengthen bilateral ties for brighter future
I saw this awkward dynamic play out recently at the annual meeting of the China Chamber of Commerce to the EU, an active bilateral bridge-builder. When a speaker representing the EU repeated “systemic rival”, the reaction among Europeans and Chinese alike was palpable. It was a clumsy, awkward moment that highlighted how out of touch the wording is.
Chinese officials and trade experts reject this negative characterization, emphasizing the positive elements of partnership and cooperation. The phrase is seen in Beijing as politicized and unnecessarily confrontational, undermining trust and making pragmatic engagement more difficult.
During my years of living in Shenzhen, I witnessed the energy of hardworking people determined to succeed. It was a culture shock to revisit Europe after pandemic-enforced absence to discover just how slow and unproductive we have become in Europe compared to Asia.
In less than five years, Shenzhen opened five new metro lines, laid thousands of kilometers of high-speed rail track, opened dozens of new public parks and highways, extended its airport and pioneered smart digital automated zero-carbon port terminals to handle goods. I used driverless taxis and saw infrastructure projects progressing on a huge scale. In Belgium, I rarely saw a worker moving on the many unfinished public works suffocating Brussels’ EU quarter.
When the phrase “systemic rival” emerged in March 2019, it was driven by a mix of European anxieties: a weakening European economic outlook, China’s growth, and concerns over market access and reciprocity for European companies in the Chinese market.
European Parliament members at the time, many of whom lacked deep knowledge of China, promoted the label to signal concern about China’s political and economic model. Yet, in practice, this label revealed more about Europe’s own insecurities and failure to keep up rather than a shrewd observation of China’s actual role in the world.
There are three compelling reasons to drop “systemic rival”. The label is outdated and counterproductive. The world has changed, but the language perpetuates suspicion and division rather than forward-looking engagement.
Global challenges require partnership, not rivalry. The EU and China together account for a huge share of the world’s economic output. Cooperation is essential for managing climate change, multilateralism, inequality, the United States’ trade wars, joint innovation and global responses to crises. Framing China as a rival undermines the trust needed for collaboration.
With protectionism and isolationism growing, the EU cannot afford to be antagonistic toward China. Only by engaging as a partner can Europe help shape a stable, rules-based order and advance its own interests. The alternative is weakness in a world shaped by bullying and coercion from the US and faster, better innovations from China.
As global trade and geopolitics shift, the EU should embrace a forward-looking partnership with Asia, and China in particular. Mutual respect, pragmatic cooperation and a shared commitment to multilateralism are essential to peace, stability and prosperity.
ALSO READ: China, EU cast brighter decades amid challenges
The caustic “systemic rival” label is a relic of a different era; one that has never served Europe’s interests and is a useless obstacle to mature discussion.
Having witnessed China’s transformation, I am convinced it is time for Europe to adapt its approach, face up to today’s realities, make wise strategic moves, or risk failing all Europeans who want to live in a stable, rules-based global trading system that delivers peace and shared prosperity, not conflict, inequality and wasted opportunities.
The author is chairman of Gerrha Global, a consultancy focusing on EU-China collaboration on digital green transformation, former senior vice-president at Huawei’s headquarters in Shenzhen, and former Global Head of Trade, the Netherlands.
The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.