Washington whitewashes green benefits to paint Chinese vehicles as a threat
For decades, the United States has been hostage to domestic oil and automotive industries. It accounts for the highest per capita emissions in the world, and President Joe Biden believes transitioning to electric vehicles (EVs) is vital for national and even global well-being.
The problem, however, is that aside from Tesla, most US EV makers are not competitive, and even Tesla is too pricey for a lot of consumers. The US also lacks the manufacturing capacity, the most advanced battery technologies, and even the capacity to set up a national network of charging stations.
China is mass producing high-quality and affordable EVs, charging stations, and renewable energy products, including solar panels and wind turbines. And yet, Washington is doing what it can to prevent US citizens from having the right to buy these products, effectively prolonging their unsustainable dependence on fossil fuels. Why?
READ MORE: Top auto giants reach out for Chinese tech
It is easy enough to see that the US is afraid of a rising China displacing its traditional dominance in oil and legacy automotive production, and is worried about what happens to the dollar in a post-oil global economy. So it is not surprising that Washington is saying the primary justification for blocking Chinese EVs relates to national security. Nevertheless, the security concerns being hyped are rather spurious.
Keep in mind that Chinese EVs do not actually have a presence in the US market given all the discrimination they face and that Chinese EV companies are not State-owned enterprises. Therefore, the keyword here seems to be “imagine”, as was repeatedly said by Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo numerous times in recent remarks. She said imagine if hundreds of thousands EVs made in China — which she described as a “foreign adversary” — were driving on US roads, then “it’s not difficult to imagine the security risk this would pose”. Even so, she imagines it for us, telling us that we should see Chinese EVs as smartphones on wheels, collecting sensitive data about US drivers, EV cameras recording videos of US infrastructure, warning that “someone in Beijing” might control them remotely, perhaps like enemy drones.
Such risks, even if they did exist, could be easily mitigated, as Tesla did in the Chinese market, as security experts have pointed out. However, real solutions are not wanted in the US.
What is funny of course is that even Huawei has an EV line now, and one can well imagine the US horror of a Huawei EV on US roads, quietly tracking how many times people secretly visit a McDonald’s Drive Thru well past their dinner time, and then selling that information to Taco Bell.
The Chinese position is that the US fears competition, not spying or sabotage, and that the real goal here is US protectionism. Presently US tariffs on Chinese EVs stand at 27 percent. US citizens can qualify for substantial federal income tax credits for purchasing an EV but only if it or its battery is not made in China.
Further, Biden claims that US protections are warranted to counter Chinese protections, that the Chinese EV industry benefits from Chinese State subsidies and policy supports, and that international EV companies have faced discriminatory practices in China.
Ironically, the development of China’s EV industry is already emerging as a textbook case study of free market competition. Indeed, the fact that Chinese companies were forced to compete with international companies such as Tesla, which were encouraged to produce and sell in China, has been cited as a key reason why China has emerged as the global leader in EVs.
Meanwhile, US “experts” argue that China might put its overcapacity to work and start dumping EVs in the US market regardless of tariffs, thereby justifying increasing efforts to keep them out of the market entirely. That is extremely unlikely but if it happened, then what an incredible boon for US consumers and the environment.
Protectionism aims largely at protecting domestic industries, but in fact, US policy also wants to damage the Chinese economy, above all in areas where it enjoys comparative advantages or anything related to high technology. The US understands that China has substantially closed the technology gap that previously made China vulnerable to foreign aggression and hegemony.
This is another reason why the US is moving against Chinese EVs and other technology products, including suppressing China’s access to advanced chips, as part of a broader US strategy that aims to encircle and suppress Chinese modernization overall.
In a difficult campaign for reelection, Biden is trying to appeal to voters in the industrial Midwest, including Michigan — home to many of the big US car companies that have failed to offer competitive EV products. While Biden previously has joined autoworker picket lines during strikes, his policies toward Israel’s attacks on Gaza have alienated a huge block of Muslim voters residing in Michigan.
ALSO READ: 'Overcapacity' an excuse to target 'made-in-China'
Meanwhile, former president and current leading Republican candidate Donald Trump has attacked the very idea of climate change as a “communist plot”, one designed to transfer US automotive and energy dominance to China. We all know where he stands and what will happen if he returns to office.
In short, there are many reasons why the US is afraid of Chinese EVs, and why it will continue to restrict their access to the US market. Nevertheless, Chinese EVs will continue to expand globally, and sooner or later US consumers will find themselves left further behind, stepping on the gas, trying to catch up.
The author is a professor of politics and international relations at East China Normal University and a senior research fellow with the Institute for the Development of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics at Southeast University and the Hainan CGE Peace Development Foundation. The author contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily.
The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.
